Re: autoextend size vs. extent size in LMT

From: Norman Dunbar <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:44:40 +0100
Message-ID: <E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA70241A9AE@lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk>

If anyone is (still) interested, I started the instance with event 10046 set to level 12 and reran my test.

Made not a jot of difference - the trace files don't show whether the extending was done in one shot or not.
There is a single update of TAB$ and one update of OBJ$ so I suspect that a single +64KB resize was done.

Mind you, the bind variable values look a bit suspicious to me anyway in the raw trace file.

Oh well, never mind.

Regards,
Norman.

---

Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk

Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com


-------------------------------------

Received on Thu Jun 20 2002 - 07:44:40 CDT