Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle comparison

Re: Oracle comparison

From: Galen Boyer <galenboyer_at_hotpop.com>
Date: 18 Jun 2002 22:04:05 -0500
Message-ID: <uk7ov4x54.fsf@hotpop.com>


On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk wrote:

> As a rule of thumb (cos I'm conservative) I am very suspicious of
> rapid development, I'm also *somewhat* suspicious of open source, In
> general you get what you pay for. In the case of Open Source that
> points at hidden costs (like support expertise etc).

Have you used any of these products and had to ask for help? Its been my experience that the open source/free community is as responsive as I could ever hope for.

We had threads on Oracle myths. This seems to be an Open source myth that should just die a quick death.

-- 
Galen deForest Boyer
Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground.
Received on Tue Jun 18 2002 - 22:04:05 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US